last minute american campaigning has flooded much of the world news
the past few days especially with this election amidst global wars
linked directly with oil issues, a shaky economy, and of course
radical terrorists that disrupt the security of people all over the
world...so here i am also trying to add in my two cents spearheading
into this fury....

it is no secret that wall street heavily roots for a bush victory and
it also is no secret that the media is completely for bush
bashing...with this being said, it is easy to be at gripes with the
one who has shown flaws and has arguably led our country into this
downward spiral...with the phrase "downward spiral" already being
used...i'll move forward by not supporting this elections alternative
counterpart

as the republicans remade themselves after the events of 9/11, bush
recast himself as the accidental protagonist of a new and dramatic
national narrative...he set about elbowing his way into the small
pantheon of modern presidents - FDR after pearl harbor, kennedy during
the cuban missile crisis - who led the nation in profound moments of
peril.  bush stamped his war on terror with great adamant resolve...an
almost stubborn suicidal arrogance especially without the help of
other global powers...al queada and its allies constituted a new kind
of menace, stealthier and less predictable but were the equivalent of
the hitlers and stalins before them and defeating them would require
the same conviction that guided america's previous campaigns.

"america is the world's great force for freedom, unsparing in its use
of pre-emptive might and unstinting in it determination to stamp out
tyranny and terrorism...kerry seemed to offer no grand thematic
equivalent."

in the liberal view, this non-state enemy more closely resembling a
drug cartel than any large threatening regime calls to be cured by
expanding diplomacy abroad in winning the ideological struggle so that

<!--
D(["mb","people stop turning themselves into suicide bombers...while this
resolve seems more humane and almost more correct, it is soo
idealogical that it would take an eternity to acheive close to
nothing, when your own country is being bombed, the quick monstrous
retaliation almost seems like the right thing to do...blame 7th inning
god bless america songs for that one....

this liberal view to work cooperatively with special forces and
foreign governments and restoring an american reputation as a
sensitive seeker of peace is not necessarily the right way to handle a
country in fear...with a country already in the midst of war, the
commander in chief needs to lead the world's greatest army of
patriotic soldiers with worldly conviction, simply ignorant and simply
confident.  kerry does have a realistic apocalyptic view on terrorism
saying that they are a constant nuisance that can never be ended, you
just have to fight it until its not threatening the fabric of your
life.

honestly, these two candidates stand for almost the same end results
in many areas...its just that they take different roles in leadership,
methods, and policy to want to acheive them...in a time where our
country is already at war and kerry's new wave liberal philosophies
are not convincing enough to sway to another alternative so quickly,
i'd have to put him aside for the time being...

it is obvious that a presidents accomplishments are never seen during
their time in office, it is always the results of the previous 4 years
so in this case, bush's first term will most evidently be reflected
now....
",1]
);

//-->
people stop turning themselves into suicide bombers...while this
resolve seems more humane and almost more correct, it is soo
idealogical that it would take an eternity to acheive close to
nothing, when your own country is being bombed, the quick monstrous
retaliation almost seems like the right thing to do...blame 7th inning
god bless america songs for that one....

this liberal view to work cooperatively with special forces and
foreign governments and restoring an american reputation as a
sensitive seeker of peace is not necessarily the right way to handle a
country in fear...with a country already in the midst of war, the
commander in chief needs to lead the world's greatest army of
patriotic soldiers with worldly conviction, simply ignorant and simply
confident.  kerry does have a realistic apocalyptic view on terrorism
saying that they are a constant nuisance that can never be ended, you
just have to fight it until its not threatening the fabric of your
life.

honestly, these two candidates stand for almost the same end results
in many areas...its just that they take different roles in leadership,
methods, and policy to want to acheive them...in a time where our
country is already at war and kerry's new wave liberal philosophies
are not convincing enough to sway to another alternative so quickly,
i'd have to put him aside for the time being...

it is obvious that a presidents accomplishments are never seen during
their time in office, it is always the results of the previous 4 years
so in this case, bush's first term will most evidently be reflected
now....

ok...really no time to finish this...im heading to BALI tonight!

 

Dear Derek:

As for me spreading my butter on the toast of the land…fyi: Indonesia inhabits most of the world’s muslims and its fasting month here….so all nightlife is currently suspended…Singapore has one club…that supposedly everyone who’s 27 has been to since they were 12…..zouk one night….velvet the next….with the amount of flaming lamborghini’s I took that night…I don’t think I want to go back….